Texas Propositions 1–17: A Voter’s Guide

The upcoming Texas ballot includes 17 propositions covering education, taxes, judicial oversight, water infrastructure, research, voting, and parental rights. Here’s a neutral breakdown of each to help you make an informed choice.

---

📘 Proposition 1: Technical College Infrastructure Fund (SJR 59)

What it does: Creates two permanent funds for Texas State Technical College and workforce education, starting with $850 million. Funds would be constitutional and outside the annual budget process.

Supporters say:

• Strengthens workforce training and modernizes facilities.

• Provides stable, long-term investment in Texas’ economy.

Opponents say:

• Reduces oversight and flexibility, locking funds in permanently.

• May not guarantee equal funding across campuses.

Bottom line: Permanent, protected funding for technical colleges vs. less flexibility for lawmakers.

---

📘 Proposition 2: Capital Gains Tax Ban (SJR 18)

What it does: Permanently bans any state tax on capital gains (profits from investments). Texas doesn’t currently have this tax.

Supporters say:

• Protects Texans from future tax increases.

• Encourages investment and economic growth.

Opponents say:

• Benefits wealthier individuals more than average families.

• Reduces future revenue flexibility for lawmakers.

Bottom line: Locks in low taxes vs. limits future budget options.

---

📘 Proposition 3: Bail Denial Authority (SJR 5)

What it does: Requires or allows judges to deny bail for certain felony suspects if they pose a flight risk or danger.

Supporters say:

• Increases public safety and prevents crimes by high-risk defendants.

• Strengthens judicial accountability.

Opponents say:

• More people may be jailed before trial, increasing costs.

• Could disproportionately affect poor or minority defendants.

Bottom line: Public safety vs. due process and fairness concerns.

---

📘 Proposition 4: Revenue for Water Fund (HJR 7)

What it does: Directs part of sales and use tax revenue to the Texas Water Fund for infrastructure and rural access.

Supporters say:

• Ensures long-term water security and infrastructure improvements.

• Helps rural areas and supports economic growth.

Opponents say:

• Earmarks money, reducing budget flexibility.

• Oversight and distribution could be a concern.

Bottom line: Secured water funding vs. reduced legislative flexibility.

---

📘 Propositions 5–11: Property & Tax Exemptions Package

What they do: Reduce or prevent taxes for ranchers, businesses, veterans, homeowners, and seniors.

• Prop 5: Exempts animal feed for sale from property tax.

• Prop 6: Blocks occupation tax on securities transactions.

• Prop 7: Lets surviving spouses of certain veterans keep homestead exemptions.

• Prop 8: Bans state estate, inheritance, and gift taxes.

• Prop 9: Exempts income-producing property/equipment from ad valorem taxes.

• Prop 10: Temporary exemption for rebuilt value of homes destroyed by fire.

• Prop 11: Expands homestead exemptions for elderly or disabled homeowners.

Bottom line: Targeted tax relief vs. potential reduced revenue for public services.

---

📘 Proposition 12: Judicial Conduct Reforms (SJR 27)

What it does: Revises the structure and authority of bodies that investigate and discipline judges.

Supporters say:

• Improves accountability and consistency in discipline.

• Strengthens public trust in the judiciary.

Opponents say:

• Could centralize power and reduce judicial independence.

• Administrative costs may increase.

Bottom line: Stronger oversight vs. concerns about independence and cost.

---

📘 Proposition 13: Homestead Exemption Increase (SJR 2)

What it does: Raises school-district homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000.

Supporters say:

• Lowers property taxes, especially for middle-class homeowners.

• Encourages homeownership and protects long-term residents.

Opponents say:

• Reduces revenue for schools.

• May shift tax burden to others.

Bottom line: Tax relief for homeowners vs. potential school funding impact.

---

📘 Proposition 14: Dementia Prevention & Research Institute (SJR 3)

What it does: Creates a state-funded brain research institute with a $3 billion fund near Midland for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and related research.

Supporters say:

• Advances research, treatment, and cures.

• Creates jobs and positions Texas as a leader in medical research.

Opponents say:

• Large upfront cost from general revenue.

• Uncertainty about research outcomes and sustainability.

Bottom line: Investing in research vs. committing billions of taxpayer dollars.

---

📘 Propositions 15–17: Voting, Parental Rights & Border Tax Exemption

What they do:

• Prop 15: Affirms parents as primary decision-makers for their children.

• Prop 16: Codifies in the Constitution that only U.S. citizens may vote.

• Prop 17: Allows property in border counties to get a tax exemption for value added by border security infrastructure.

Bottom line: Strengthens parental authority, clarifies voter eligibility, and provides targeted tax relief — balanced against concerns about limits on government guidance, unnecessary codification, or narrow tax benefits.

---

✅ How to Use This Guide

When voting, consider:

• Stability vs. flexibility (Propositions 1, 2, 4)

• Public safety vs. fairness (Prop 3)

• Tax relief vs. revenue for services (Props 5–11, 13, 17)

• Oversight vs. independence (Prop 12)

• Investment in research vs. budget trade-offs (Prop 14)

• Family authority and voting rules vs. policy limits (Props 15–16)

  
  

  Click here for more details.

The Trouble with Sound Bytes: Missing the Bigger Picture

Let’s talk about something that really gets under my skin: Sound Bytes. You know what I mean—those frustratingly brief snippets of longer statements that often leave out critical context. It’s like someone trying to describe a delicious, multi-course meal by only mentioning the salad. 😩

Sound Bytes are typically 15 seconds or less, and they can be downright misleading. People hear a tiny fraction of a statement and jump to conclusions, making assumptions without taking the time to investigate the entire context. It’s a classic case of “the devil is in the details,” and unfortunately, many people seem to have forgotten how to read beyond the headline.

For example, during Kamala Harris's recent appearance, her full response to a question about the cost of living and homeownership was far more nuanced than what you might gather from a quick Sound Byte. Yet, many will form their opinions based solely on those brief clips.

If you're curious about the full scope of what she had to say, I’ve got you covered! Here’s a link to the full transcript of her appearance. 📜 [Insert link here]

And just for clarity, I’ve also broken down her complete answer in a concise outline. Here’s what she actually said:

• Acknowledgment: Thanked the couple for sharing their story and recognized the struggles of young Americans.

• Key Issues Identified: The American Dream is increasingly elusive, highlighting the importance of aspirations and hard work.

• Strategies for Change:

  • Lowering Everyday Costs: Focusing on reducing prices of necessities, particularly groceries, and addressing price gouging during crises.
  • Supporting Homeownership: Proposing $25,000 down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers.
  • Empowering Small Businesses: Committing to support small businesses with a proposed $50,000 tax deduction for startups.

In a world that loves to consume information in bite-sized pieces, let’s not forget to dig deeper. For anyone willing to listen, there’s always more than meets the eye—or ear!

So next time you hear a Sound Byte, ask yourself: “What’s the whole story?” Because missing the context could mean missing the truth.

The Story of Willard

If you were standing on Smith Lane in Charenton, Louisiana on a September morning in 1935, you’d probably hear cicadas buzzing, smell something frying, and feel the humidity trying to choke the life out of you. But somewhere in the cypress-thick swamps of St. Mary Parish, a baby was being nursed not with milk, but with bean juice. That baby would become a man whose name would echo through our family like a church bell during Sunday service—Willard Jacquot, better known as “Shonk.”

The Great Depression was still whooping America’s behind, Franklin Roosevelt was busy inventing Social Security, and Black folks in Louisiana were farming land they didn’t own while living under laws designed to keep them in their “place.” But Mama Laura and Papa Norbert were not about that life. They took in Willard when his mama couldn’t nurse him and raised him on equal parts prayers, chores, and whatever beans were left over.

Papa ran what we like to call The House of No Discussion. If he said “No,” there was no follow-up meeting. Mama Laura, on the other hand, was like a backwoods lawyer—quick with a laugh, quicker with a smack, and always negotiating peace treaties between Papa and the kids. The Jacquot household was crowded: siblings Margaret, Irmanine, Wilson Jr., Woodrow, plus a rotating cast of orphaned cousins—Calvin, Leroy, Samuel, and Mary. You couldn’t walk three feet without tripping over a barefoot kid, a mosquito, or a chore you were supposed to be doing.

Willard started school in a one-room shack next to the church. He read by oil lamp, wrote letters for Mama because she couldn’t read or write, and memorized addresses like they were Bible verses. But sometimes, hunger won, and he’d tie a biscuit around his neck, eat it before lunch, and just walk home. That little trick ended when Mama Laura and Irma staged an intervention.

Out in the fields, Papa enforced The Corn Rule: exactly three kernels in each hole. Drop two? The belt. Drop four? The belt. Toss the seeds under the bridge to skip planting? The belt and a lecture. Willard only tested that rule once.

Fast-forward to the 1950s. Willard moved to Houston as part of the Great Migration. He got a job, but more importantly, he got a glimpse of Irma—a nurse from Kashmere Gardens via Smithland, TX—at a segregated bus stop near Rice University. Willard’s eyes went straight to the front where Irma was. Through a chain of connections worthy of a soap opera, he got her number, endured Houston heat for bus-stop encounters, and sealed the deal.

From 1954 to 1968, they had seven kids: Esther Pearl (the instigator), Evelyn (the quiet storm), Willard Jr. (gone too soon), Michael (the talker), Ronald (the protector), Laura (the reporter
), and Gerald (the loyalist). This was during the Civil Rights Era—Dr. King was marching, Medgar Evers was assassinated, and Willard was at home raising his own little army of opinionated, hardworking children.

Work-wise, he started shining shoes, moved up to janitor at Rice University (cleaning the marble halls of privilege), then to supervisor, and finally to the Southern Pacific Railroad—where he never called in sick unless there was a funeral. He was baptized, sat in church every Sunday, and raised his kids on Mama Laura’s mantra: “Do good, and good gonna follow you.”

He faced heartbreak—outliving three children. He faced disaster—when his house burned. And when a shady contractor tried to hustle him, Willard hit him with the Louisiana version of a cease-and-desist: “I ain’t giving you nothing upfront.” The man backed down. The house got rebuilt. Paid in full.

In his final years, Willard was still giving orders. “Don’t wait on me. Be ready. Handle your business.” He remembered everyone who helped him and regretted not thanking some of them sooner. His stories weren’t for pity—they were life instructions.

Sure, the census once got his name wrong as “Willard Jacks.” But no census can capture a man raised on bean juice, who planted corn with military precision, raised seven kids, buried three, rebuilt a home, and loved one woman for life.

So on his 90th birthday, we don’t just remember him. We tell the truth—loud, funny, and proud. Because in this family, “Shonk” doesn’t just mean Willard Jacquot. It means grit, love, and the right to laugh through all of it.

Cowboy Carter Was More Than a Concert—It Was a Spiritual Experience

Everyone’s out here speculating about Act III, but honestly…I’m not ready for Act II to end. Cowboy Carter has felt like a spiritual, ancestral experience—one that reached across time and memory and found me exactly where I was.

Y’all. I need Beyoncé to drop a Cowboy Carter movie or documentary because I was OBSESSED with the video interludes. The visuals were stunning. The storytelling was cinematic. I only made it to the last show and avoided every livestream like my life depended on it, so most of the show felt brand new to me.

I had been looking forward to hearing “Daughter” live since my very first listen, and she did not disappoint. I was not ready. And that “This is theater” interlude with the dress that literally transforms mid-performance—I had seen the pics, but I didn’t realize the dress actually changes like that. Icon behavior.

Now here's where it gets wild. My niece put me on to this Houston restaurant called Spaghetti Western, and it became our go-to family meal spot. That spiraled me into a full spaghetti western rabbit hole, so when Beyoncé started giving us cowboy grit and cinema realness, I was locked in. The way she worked Caro mio ben into the western vibe felt like a haunting little hymn floating across the desert. And honestly, adding an Italian opera to a spaghetti western aesthetic just makes sense—those films are Italian at their core, dramatic by design, and full of long stares, emotional tension, and soaring scores.

Westerns had become a weekly thing in our lives thanks to my uncle—so Cowboy Carter felt like it landed right in the middle of our real life. He was living with my mom, who could no longer care for him and needed care herself, so we were going over more frequently. Those cozy watch nights became a kind of unspoken ritual during a season when a lot was shifting at home.

Later that year, I pre-ordered the art book thinking I’d just flip through it on the couch in peace. I didn’t know how much I was going to need that book. I didn’t have any Christmas plans last year, but a bunch of my extended family also ended up going to the Beyoncé Bowl, so we tailgated together and turned it into this beautiful, joyful surprise celebration.

The art book got delayed, and it didn’t arrive until the week of my mom’s memorial service. People were mad that the “exclusive” shirt we got for waiting was eventually made available to everyone, but it said “100,000 watts of healing power”—and I needed every single watt.

This whole era has meant so much to me. It’s been personal. It's been healing. And it’s been peak Beyoncé. I could go on forever.

---

---

Nomads, Nature, and the Myth of Permanence: A Childhood Theory That Still Makes Sense

---

When I was a kid, I came up with a theory—completely unresearched, just a thought that popped into my head and stuck with me: maybe people used to be nomads because of the weather.

It made perfect sense to me. I had just learned about birds migrating for the winter and how they fly south when it gets too cold. So I thought, why wouldn’t people do the same? Why would anyone just sit still in one place, waiting for storms or snow or heatwaves to pass, when they could simply move?

I didn’t know anything about historical climate patterns, ancient civilizations, or housing developments. I just had questions—and this one stuck. As I got older, I noticed that this theory kept resurfacing every time a natural disaster made headlines.

Flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires—every time one of these events happened, I found myself thinking, should people even live there permanently? I don’t mean that judgmentally. I know people don’t always have the option to pick up and go. Jobs, family, economics, and deep generational ties keep people rooted. But the question still lingers: Is this a place meant for permanence?

Because here’s the truth—many of the most beautiful, fertile, or resource-rich places are also places prone to natural disruption. River valleys flood. Coastal towns get hurricanes. Plains face tornadoes. Deserts get scorching heat and wildfires. And yet, we build and rebuild, with the assumption that our homes and cities are forever.

I lived next to the Mississippi River for two years and saw firsthand how the water would rise and fall. Quiet one day, almost touching the roads another. There was a rhythm to it, a flow that didn’t ask for permission. That river wasn’t interested in our timetables or property lines. It was just being what it has always been: a river.

It’s strange, then, how we often act surprised when nature does what it naturally does. After a flood or a tornado, you’ll sometimes hear people say things like, “God must be angry.” But I don’t think that’s it at all. I think we forget—maybe even refuse to believe—that nature has a life of its own. The dry creek bed won’t stay dry forever. The wind won’t always be still. The ground beneath us can and will shift, and the skies can turn on us with little warning.

That’s not punishment. That’s nature.

And yet, modern life is built on the idea of permanence. We construct homes, sign 30-year mortgages, buy insurance policies, and make long-term plans. We treat the land as fixed, as if it’s supposed to adjust to us. But history—and nature—show us again and again that this isn’t how it works.

Maybe that childhood theory wasn’t so far off. Maybe being nomadic wasn’t just about hunting and gathering or avoiding enemies—it was about listening to the land. Moving with it. Responding to its rhythms instead of trying to dominate them.

I’m not saying we all need to pack up and start roaming again (though van life TikTok is trying). But maybe we need to rethink what “permanent housing” really means in places where nature is known to have the final say. Maybe our definitions of safety, security, and “home” need to evolve to include mobility, adaptability, and humility.

Because when we treat disasters like surprises—like interruptions—we miss the deeper truth: this is the natural flow of life. We can prepare, build better, relocate if necessary. But first, we have to remember that we’re not separate from nature. We’re a part of it.

And sometimes, just like the birds, we may need to move.

---

Reflection Questions for Readers:

• Are there places you’ve lived where the land seemed to “speak” in its own way—rising waters, strong winds, shifting earth?

• What does “permanence” mean to you, and has that definition changed over time?

• How can we honor both our desire to root and our need to adapt?

---

Technology Should Free Us, Not Replace Us: Rethinking Work, Worth, and Space in a Capitalist World

Lately, I’ve been thinking about how we respond to technology and change—especially AI—and how that ties into bigger questions about work, worth, and what it means to have “enough.”

There’s a lot of fear around AI replacing jobs, and honestly, I get it. When you hear that machines can do things faster, cheaper, and better than humans, it’s natural to worry about what that means for your place in the world. But here’s the thing: making tedious, repetitive work easier shouldn’t be a threat—it should be a relief.

If someone spent 40+ hours a week mopping floors or doing other physically exhausting, monotonous tasks, why shouldn’t a machine or AI step in and take over? It means that person can focus on something more fulfilling, creative, or simply enjoy more free time. This shift shouldn’t make anyone feel “worthless.” Humans are valuable not just for what they produce, but for who they are. And in a fair world, if businesses can make billions by cutting production costs with technology, they should absolutely use some of those resources to care for their workers—to ensure everyone benefits, not just the owners.

That’s the problem with how our society currently operates. The capitalist system pushes us to prioritize profit and production above all else, and that can make people feel disposable if they’re no longer “productive” in the traditional sense. It’s no wonder there’s anxiety around AI and automation—it feels like if you don’t keep up, you’ll be left behind, with fewer social supports to catch you.

This connects with another thing I’ve noticed in my own life: my husband and I live in a four-bedroom, two-story house with a den and a large kitchen. That’s a lot of space for just two people. We don’t have seven kids or even a large extended family living with us—although we’ve had up to seven guests stay overnight once or twice. In theory, more people could live here with us, and that’s what this kind of house is designed for: accommodating bigger groups, families, or even shared living arrangements.

But here’s the catch—most people don’t want to share their space. They want their “own space.” And that’s totally normal. But it also means a lot of us live physically isolated from one another, even when we have the room to build community under one roof. Inviting someone to live with you isn’t just about space; it’s about building a relationship, agreeing on rules, navigating boundaries, and sharing your life. That requires effort—something capitalism doesn’t necessarily reward or encourage.

Instead, capitalism often pushes the idea that the way to succeed is to work harder, make more money, and buy more stuff—bigger houses, more cars, fancier gadgets—whether or not that actually makes us happier or more connected. We’re stuck chasing more, thinking it equals success, but often it just means more distance—from each other and from what truly matters.

So yes, I’m all for technology and innovation. I want tedious jobs automated and machines to make life easier. But I also want us to remember that humans are more than cogs in a production line. Technology should free us from drudgery, not make us feel obsolete.

And having “enough” shouldn’t just be about how much stuff or space we have—it should mean having enough connection, care, and support. If there’s extra space in a house, why not use it to build community? If technology can make us more productive, why not let that productivity support a better quality of life for everyone, not just the wealthy?

At the end of the day, it’s not about fighting technology or fearing progress. It’s about redefining what we value: prioritizing humanity over production, relationships over possessions, and care over mere efficiency.

💐 “Irma Jean: Silent, Stitched, and Supreme” 💐

In honor of what would have been her 92nd birthday, let's talk about Irma Jean.

Let the record show: her name was Irma Jean Jackson, not “Imogene,” no matter what the 1940 U.S. Census claimed. She wasn’t a typo—she was a force of starch and sass. Born in Marion, Texas, Irma came into the world in the heart of the Great Depression, on Smithland Road, where chickens roamed the yard like feathered bouncers, and washing laundry was a full-body CrossFit class.

In that 1940 census, little 7-year-old Irma was living with her parents Sylvester and Julia Jackson and five siblings in a wooden house that probably creaked with every prayer. It was country. Like "eat your bathwater-warmed biscuits on the porch while dodging wasps" country. 

🌳And then came the Tree Incident of ‘45.🌳

See, Irma’s little sister Charles Etta was six years younger than her, and seven younger than their sister Lulu. Which meant by the time Irma and Lulu were full-blown, tree-climbing teenagers, Charles Etta had entered her "Wait for meeee!" era. So there they were—Irma, Lulu, and baby Charles Etta—scaling trees like squirrels on a sugar high, and then jumping out like there was a prize for landing flair. But poor Charles Etta? She jumped, landed funky, and broke her arm.

Now, Irma and Lulu knew the stakes. If anything happened to Charles Etta—even if it was her fault—it was automatically their fault. So what did they do? They tucked her into bed like a porcelain doll and told every adult who came by that she was just... very tired. Super sleepy. Had a long day of being six. Meanwhile, Charles Etta was laying there with a whole broken arm, blinking at the ceiling like. 

From those dusty red roads, she sprouted something elegant, no-chaser. By 1950, now a teenager on Old Gin Road, Irma had already mastered the art of the quiet power play. She didn’t say much—but her hands? Always in motion. She sewed her own clothes like a runway designer with a chicken coop side hustle. But this wasn’t just Sunday-best sewing. She let her siblings pick their own fabric. That meant her mama might show up in paisley holiness while Queen Esther strutted in leopard print like a sanctified runway model.

Fashion democracy. Early edition.

Somewhere between threading needles and feeding chickens, Irma enrolled at Texas Southern University, back when it was becoming the Ivy League for folks with hot comb burns and big dreams. The exact dates are fuzzy, but that school ID? Real. And she was snatched to the gods in that photo.

Then came the job at Hermann Hospital. Being a Black woman in medicine in the 1950s was like being a unicorn in a snowstorm—rare, magical, and expected to fix everything. To even walk into Hermann as a nurse’s aide, you had to:

• Pass anatomy while fighting systemic racism

• Master hygiene protocols while dodging discrimination 

• Lift patients in the ER while carrying the weight of generational racism

• And rock a starched uniform so crisp it could slice through barriers 

Irma's uniforms had creases sharp enough to file your taxes.

And it was on one of those mornings—leaving Kashmere Gardens, catching a city bus to the Texas Medical Center—that she changed the course of history.

---

💘 “The Love Route: Third Ward Edition” 💘

Willard Jacquot lived on Tuam, smack dab in the middle of Third Ward royalty. He missed his usual bus one morning and, instead of waiting, took the scenic route. Destiny wears a uniform, apparently.

There on that bus: Irma. Quiet. Pressed uniform. Posture like a ballet dancer in court. Seat beside her? Empty.

Willard slid into that seat like it was musical chairs and said hi. Irma blinked. Gave him absolutely nothing.

He got off the bus dazed like, “Lord, send a follow-up plan.”

And He did. It came in the form of gossip, coworker intel, and a string of rom-com level shenanigans. Willard was out here dropping quarters into payphones like he was trying to win a radio contest. Took five buses just to MAYBE see her again. That’s not romance. That’s a Houston Transit Odyssey with a layover in desperation.

---

🧵 Marriage, Motherhood & Machine Oil 🧵

They got married. Bought a house in Settegast, where the BBQ smoke is spiritual and the kids play double dutch in church shoes.

Irma had seven kids and a sewing machine that could outrun a sports car. Baptismal gowns? Check. School clothes? Done. Church fits? Custom couture. Curtain panels? You know she hemmed those too.

She didn’t yell. She just sewed faster.

---

👥 The House of Controlled Chaos 🚨

Most mornings began with her sewing machine—clack-clack-clack—setting the rhythm of the house like a DJ on a mission.

One day, she sat near the back window with a spool of red thread, sewing “Ron” on a uniform. The house was suspiciously quiet.

Enter Esther, waving a report card like she was about to get knighted. “All A’s, Mama!”

Irma, eyebrow raised like a lie detector test, said one syllable: “Hmm.”

Translation: Bloop, you tried it.

Turns out Esther had forged every F into an A with more confidence than a bootleg tattoo artist. And then Laura, resident snitch, rolled in with timestamps and forensic handwriting analysis.

Irma? Still calm. “Hmm.”

Then came the hallway crash. Evelyn vs. Michael, WWE edition. Irma didn’t flinch. Just stepped in like Moses parting the Red Sea of sibling violence.

Ron, meanwhile, chewing toast like he knew too much. She asked who started it. Ron began gulping like he swallowed a frog. “Maybe...Michael?”

Broom. Instantly handed over. Justice delivered.

Then Gerald, the baby, came sliding in like Scooby-Doo, grinning for hugs and possibly hiding some crayons in his pocket. She rubbed his head and kept sewing.

Because even when the whole house sounded like a live sitcom, Irma was the laugh track, the director, and the producer.

---

🍾 Sakowitz Sundays 🌟

Willard told his uncle he dressed his wife up real good to go to church. Like, Sakowitz good.

That’s not just a flex. That’s a Black Excellence fashion thesis. Sakowitz was Houston’s homegrown palace of luxury retail—where high fashion met Southern elegance, and shopping was as much a social event as a transaction. Going in there and picking out clothes with your wife? That was main-character energy.

His uncle noticed that Irma was always solo at church and warned that men at church probably thought she was single, so Willard started dressing up faster than her and attending too. A few weeks later? He got baptized. She got backup.

---

🌿 The Hiram Clarke Years 🌿

Eventually, they moved to Hiram Clarke. Newer streets. Younger neighbors.

Willard bought a service station in South Park. But Irma? Irma ran the kingdom.

She:

• Bought inventory like a retail general

• Decorated with spark plugs and style

• Sewed name patches like she was dressing oil-stained royalty

And her sanctuary? That backyard was Eden with a southern twist.

She brought plants from Settegast and grew roses, bachelor's buttons, pecans, cotton, cucumbers, Chinese plums, grapefruit, figs...

She used her own homegrown cotton to dab alcohol for her insulin. Not once. Every time.

She made fig preserves so good, Willard kept eating them YEARS after she left us.

And let’s not forget the front room: sacred space. No kids. Just fancy furniture and an upright piano she played like the soundtrack of a lifetime. No one knows where she learned it. Probably just absorbed it through her spirit.

When dialysis and amputation entered the picture, Irma turned her wheelchair into a wheelbarrow. She gardened, she polished, she reached bookshelves taller than me with a rag, pledge, and the will of a warrior.

---

🛶 The Last Visit 🛶

I lived in that house from age 5 to 22. When I moved out, she was sad. That same year, she had heart blockage. Got bypass surgery like a champ.

Next thing I know, I visit after work. She’s sitting up in a glamorous nightgown with her hair curled in preparation for the next day.

The nurse was there too. Talking up a storm. People loved talking to my Granny. I wasn’t mad she was there. I was mad she was hogging the whole set. Like ma’am, I’m the grandchild, not your co-star.

I said I'd come back the next day. But while I was at work, she passed.

---

🌈 Legacy Sewn into Every Thread 🌈

She didn’t give long speeches. She wasn’t the loudest in the room. But she was the reason the room stayed standing.

From Marion's dusty roads to Third Ward buses, from Kashmere Gardens to Hiram Clarke cucumbers...

Irma Jean stitched together a life so rich, the thread can’t be broken.

And today, I don’t just remember her. I celebrate her.

With starch. With satin. With silence that shuts down foolishness and opens doors.

Happy Birthday, Granny. You were hilarious, holy, and handcrafted. We’re still running on your thread.