Technology Should Free Us, Not Replace Us: Rethinking Work, Worth, and Space in a Capitalist World

Lately, I’ve been thinking about how we respond to technology and change—especially AI—and how that ties into bigger questions about work, worth, and what it means to have “enough.”

There’s a lot of fear around AI replacing jobs, and honestly, I get it. When you hear that machines can do things faster, cheaper, and better than humans, it’s natural to worry about what that means for your place in the world. But here’s the thing: making tedious, repetitive work easier shouldn’t be a threat—it should be a relief.

If someone spent 40+ hours a week mopping floors or doing other physically exhausting, monotonous tasks, why shouldn’t a machine or AI step in and take over? It means that person can focus on something more fulfilling, creative, or simply enjoy more free time. This shift shouldn’t make anyone feel “worthless.” Humans are valuable not just for what they produce, but for who they are. And in a fair world, if businesses can make billions by cutting production costs with technology, they should absolutely use some of those resources to care for their workers—to ensure everyone benefits, not just the owners.

That’s the problem with how our society currently operates. The capitalist system pushes us to prioritize profit and production above all else, and that can make people feel disposable if they’re no longer “productive” in the traditional sense. It’s no wonder there’s anxiety around AI and automation—it feels like if you don’t keep up, you’ll be left behind, with fewer social supports to catch you.

This connects with another thing I’ve noticed in my own life: my husband and I live in a four-bedroom, two-story house with a den and a large kitchen. That’s a lot of space for just two people. We don’t have seven kids or even a large extended family living with us—although we’ve had up to seven guests stay overnight once or twice. In theory, more people could live here with us, and that’s what this kind of house is designed for: accommodating bigger groups, families, or even shared living arrangements.

But here’s the catch—most people don’t want to share their space. They want their “own space.” And that’s totally normal. But it also means a lot of us live physically isolated from one another, even when we have the room to build community under one roof. Inviting someone to live with you isn’t just about space; it’s about building a relationship, agreeing on rules, navigating boundaries, and sharing your life. That requires effort—something capitalism doesn’t necessarily reward or encourage.

Instead, capitalism often pushes the idea that the way to succeed is to work harder, make more money, and buy more stuff—bigger houses, more cars, fancier gadgets—whether or not that actually makes us happier or more connected. We’re stuck chasing more, thinking it equals success, but often it just means more distance—from each other and from what truly matters.

So yes, I’m all for technology and innovation. I want tedious jobs automated and machines to make life easier. But I also want us to remember that humans are more than cogs in a production line. Technology should free us from drudgery, not make us feel obsolete.

And having “enough” shouldn’t just be about how much stuff or space we have—it should mean having enough connection, care, and support. If there’s extra space in a house, why not use it to build community? If technology can make us more productive, why not let that productivity support a better quality of life for everyone, not just the wealthy?

At the end of the day, it’s not about fighting technology or fearing progress. It’s about redefining what we value: prioritizing humanity over production, relationships over possessions, and care over mere efficiency.