Showing posts with label women’s rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women’s rights. Show all posts

Saturday, December 6, 2025

When They Claim They’re “Protecting Women,” I Don’t Buy It




Every time I hear lawmakers say they’re protecting women, something in me pushes back. Protecting women’s sports. Protecting women’s privacy. Protecting women’s spaces. The words sound familiar, but the actions don’t match. It feels less like protection and more like performance.

Across red states—and now at the federal level—lawmakers keep pushing bills that ban transgender women from sports teams and public bathrooms. They sell these laws as care for women and girls, but all I see is a fixation on controlling a small group of people while ignoring the problems most women face every day.

Women have asked for equal pay for decades. We’ve asked for affordable childcare, paid family leave, better maternal healthcare, and real accountability for sexual assault. We’ve asked for rape kits to get tested instead of collecting dust for years. We’ve asked for protection from harassment and violence in our workplaces, schools, and homes. Yet lawmakers keep choosing a different fight—one that costs them very little politically and fixes nothing materially.

Texas now enforces laws that block trans students from using restrooms that align with their gender identity and threatens universities with massive fines if they don’t comply. Other states follow suit, redefining sex so narrowly that trans women disappear from public life altogether. On the federal stage, politicians try to rewrite civil rights protections under the banner of “fairness in women’s sports,” even though those efforts target a tiny population.

That’s what makes this feel dishonest. Trans women make up a very small percentage of the population, yet politicians center them again and again, not because they pose some widespread threat, but because they serve as a convenient symbol. Fear mobilizes voters faster than compassion ever will.

What bothers me most comes down to enforcement. Every time someone argues for bathroom bans, I ask the same question: who enforces this? Who checks? Who decides whether someone looks “female enough” to walk into a bathroom without getting questioned, stares, or worse? These laws drag all women into surveillance. They turn restrooms into spaces of suspicion. They invite strangers to police bodies—and that should disturb every single one of us.

Women didn’t ask for this. I don’t know a woman who said, “This solves my problems.” I know women who feel exhausted. Who feel unheard. Who juggle work and family without support. Who navigate healthcare systems that dismiss their pain. Who worry about safety far more often than about who stands next to them in a bathroom.

When lawmakers claim they’re helping women while ignoring everything women actually demand, it feels insulting. It feels like being used as cover. Like our lives function as talking points instead of realities that deserve serious solutions.

These laws don’t protect women. They divide us. They cast trans women as threats and treat cis women like props. They deflect attention away from broken systems and redirect it toward a group with the least power to push back.

Real support for women would look different. It would center economic security, healthcare, autonomy, and safety. It would expand opportunity instead of shrinking who belongs. It wouldn’t rely on humiliation, surveillance, or fear.

When politicians talk about protecting women, I pay attention to what they choose to protect us from—and what they choose to ignore. Right now, they ignore pay gaps, healthcare disparities, childcare crises, and violence against women. Instead, they police bathrooms.

The fact that we now have to ask who belongs in a bathroom tells me everything I need to know about how far off track we’ve gone.



Wednesday, September 25, 2024

Motherhood Isn't Mandatory: Redefining Success for Girls


From childhood, many girls are surrounded by subtle, and sometimes loud, messages that suggest motherhood is their ultimate destiny. Whether it's seeing their own moms juggling schedules and snacks like Olympic athletes or observing peers proudly parading their new baby siblings, the assumption is often that girls will follow the same path. But what if they don’t want to? What if their life goal isn’t to become a snack-slinging, stroller-pushing superhero? It’s time to talk about how families and educators can teach girls that it’s perfectly okay not to want kids. Spoiler: You can be a functional adult without ever changing a diaper.

Breaking the Mold: Early Conversations and Diverse Role Models

From an early age, most girls are handed dolls, play kitchens, and strollers, as if their future resumes will have "mother" listed under Skills. But what if we switched it up? Why not astronaut helmets, science kits, and pretend boardrooms? If we want girls to see life beyond motherhood, we need to give them more options to explore. I mean, why are all the pretend baby bottles when you could give them a tiny coffee maker and let them pretend they’re running their own café at 5 a.m. (like their future startup CEO selves)?

For real change, we need educators to step up. Think back to career day in school. Did anyone ever introduce you to a woman who didn’t have kids and was totally thriving? No? Me neither. Let's fix that. Showcasing successful women who never walked down the path of motherhood—like Oprah, who opted to change the world in different ways¹, or Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who balanced motherhood but left a legacy that transcends it²—can change the narrative. Moms are amazing, but non-moms can change the world too, just without spit-up on their shirts.

As someone who doesn’t have kids by choice (I’m Team No-Baby), I remember how awkward it felt explaining that decision to people who acted like I was cancelling a subscription to happiness. It’s important for girls to know there’s no "life script" they have to follow.

Addressing the Biological Clock Myth

Let's talk about the “biological clock.” If I had a dollar for every time someone said, “You’re going to regret it later when your clock runs out,” I could buy myself a high-end, fancy watch to remind them that I make my own timeline. While it's true that fertility decreases with age, recent studies show that women are having kids later and still thriving as mothers—or not having kids at all and living their best lives³.

Waiting until your 30s to have kids is actually pretty standard now, and yet people still act like it’s a race against time. The truth? There’s no prize for being the youngest parent in the PTA. Educators can jump in here too, by talking about the science of fertility and the joys of self-development. Imagine if health class wasn’t just about reproductive organs but also about financial stability, travel, and personal growth. In my 20s, I was busy getting certified as a fitness instructor and traveling, while others were busy… well, busy with other things (aka kids). We all have different paths.

Reclaiming Youth: Emphasizing Self-Development Over Baby-Making

There’s this sneaky idea that women are “selling their youth” if they don’t have babies early, like we’re all at a fertility garage sale, discounting our best years. But guess what? Your 20s and 30s are prime years for self-exploration, building careers, and doing what you want to do—not what society expects. My 20s weren’t about bedtime routines and diaper duty. They were about certifications, trying new hobbies, and, yes, late-night taco runs (because who says I can’t enjoy my time?).

The message to girls should be clear: your youth isn’t on sale. Use it to discover your passions, find your strengths, and create the life you want, whether that includes babies or not. Studies even show that women who wait to have kids—or who never do—can still lead incredibly satisfying lives³. Educators can add value here by emphasizing personal development in school. Imagine if instead of pushing prom and proposals, we encouraged mentorships and side hustles. Let girls know that it’s perfectly okay to figure themselves out before making lifelong commitments (to kids, or anything else).

Redefining Success: Valuing Choices Equally

We need to talk about how we define success. Right now, society still places a lot of emphasis on traditional roles, like becoming a wife or mother. But success is so much broader than that. Why not celebrate all the choices women can make? We should applaud women for their contributions to society, personal fulfillment, and professional achievements, whether they choose to have kids or not. Let’s stop measuring female success by how many baby booties are in their house and start recognizing the impact they’re making in the world.

At home, parents can do a lot to change this narrative. Throw parties for everything. Instead of just baby showers, why not have a party when your daughter graduates, starts a new job, or gets a promotion? I mean, let’s be honest: a promotion pays better than parenthood. If I had a dollar for every kid-related gift I’ve bought for others… oh wait, I dohave that dollar—I spent it on yoga classes and wine.

Conclusion: A New Story for the Next Generation

Teaching girls that it’s okay not to want children isn’t about discouraging motherhood—it’s about showing them that they have choices. By normalizing child-free paths and highlighting diverse role models, we give the next generation of women the freedom to decide for themselves what role, if any, motherhood will play in their lives.

So let’s raise a glass (of mocktails, wine, or kombucha—your choice) to a future where girls know they can be anything they want to be: CEOs, travelers, educators, or taco enthusiasts—without the expectation that they’ll also be mothers.


References:

  1. Parker, K. (2015). Oprah Winfrey on Not Having Children and How She Sees Her Legacy. O, The OprahMagazine.
  2. Ginsburg, R. B. (2020). RBG's Legacy: Balancing Motherhood and Supreme Court Justice. The New YorkTimes.
  3. Schmidt, L., & Sobotka, T. (2022). Fertility Trends and Delayed Childbearing: A Global Perspective. Demographic Research.